The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Yanksox 00:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason -- not notable. Also not capitalized correctly! Invitatious 21:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC) (I have moved the page.)[reply]

• Keep generally schools are held to be notable enough to have Wikipedia articles. While this article is currently particularly poor (I'd earlier tagged it for improvement) it is about a real school [1] and should be kept and improved. Gwernol 21:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep as per above. Roodog2k 22:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, schools are notable, especially one that's been around since 1697. Accurizer 23:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep. Schools are not inherently notable and there is no policy or guideline saying so. That said, I would suspect a school founded in 1697 may have some sort of notability and editors ought to be given the opportunity to expand on that point. Fluit 18:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Abington Friends is well known in its own context, and the historical nature helps (though of course, the article could use some expansion). Dirk Gently 14:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.