The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect and merge to Sergeant Bluff-Luton School District. Edit history remains intact and can be used while merging content. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 11:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As Schoolcruft. Article is not encyclopaedic, does not meet WP:N, WP:V, and WP:RS. Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge into Sergeant Bluff-Luton School District, corresponding section already exists; but shorten the text considerably. (A complete listing of the school's staff is not really suited for an encyclopedia, in my point of view.) --B. Wolterding 15:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since all high schools are inherently notable. Noroton 15:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

quite seriously, perhaps you can try to convince us of this, or at least outline why. ?DGG 01:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been doing just that, ad nauseum, in the past 200 deletion discussions I've participated in, so I guess I figured everyone knew it. But I guess I should do it every time. Here's the argument: User:Noroton/opinions. Noroton 20:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I agree with Wolterding that a complete listing of the school's staff is unsuitable. It's also an easy way for a vandal to abuse someone at the school (with misspellings, insertion of non-employees into lists of employees). In fact, I'm just going to delete it now, and I suggest that as any editor comes across similar lists we all just delete them. The superintendent of schools and the principal should be the only names in these articles (if even they belong) and all information needs to be footnoted, especially names. If we allow these lists of names, we're just playing with fire. Noroton 15:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Sergeant Bluff-Luton School District, and merge any useful school material (if there is any) into that district article. No verifiable claims of special notability per WP:SCHOOL or WP:ORG - notable alumni, student composition, or staff, historical relevance, unusual location or architecture, athletic accomplishments or records, national news media coverage for notable events, etc. --T-dot ( ^Talk/contribs ) 17:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expand. Satisfactory. — RJH (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as above. Eusebeus 22:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Sergeant Bluff-Luton School District - Article does not establish notability with no verification. In the long-term any notable information on the school can be included in a expansion of the school district article. Camaron1 | Chris 10:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as above. I have searched for notable references on this school for the last hour and I have failed to find anything that would satisfy WP:N. There is, however, a fine place for this school in the Sergeant Bluff-Luton School District article. Trusilver 20:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to the district article per WP:N and WP:V, as there are no WP:RS cited to support notability. --Butseriouslyfolks 02:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.