The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was db-copyvio. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 03:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion log entry: 05:14, 27 September 2008 DGG (Talk | contribs) deleted "Beatific Vision (2008 film)" ‎ (G12: Blatant copyright infringement: of http://www.beatificvisionthemovie.com/syn.html) — Becksguy (talk) 05:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beatific Vision (2008 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability on 4 Google searches, Movie Review Query Engine, and Rotten Tomatoes. Also, there was a prod on here a few months ago.Schuym1 (talk) 23:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Promotional tone, no notability asserted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 23:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per prior prod. MBisanz ^talk 14:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:18, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete for blatant copyright infringement. This is a clearcut WP:CSD G12 deletion candidate, since it's a word-for-word copy of the official site synopsis [1]. Suggest speedy deletion without prejudice and AfD close per WP:COPYVIO. If someone wants to come back and write a non-copyvio version, with reliable sources that satisfy WP:V, WP:N, WP:MOVIE, etc., then fine. — Becksguy (talk) 03:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - I also tagged article with CSD G12. — Becksguy (talk) 03:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.