This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Internet culture This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Internet Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The main contributor to this entry appears to be the subject of the entry himself. This goes against Wikipedia guidelines - Wikipedia is neither LinkedIn, nor is it Facebook. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.103.138.76 (talk) 00:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's as may be. However, material (to this present, entirely unconnected/uninvolved reader) appears neutral & limited, sticking sparsely to bare facts. Notability is also fine, as Minds.com founder & Chief Exec. Finally, article has since been adjusted by a variety of editors, even if those edits are small. Does it still warrant a box, after a year? --nielspeterqm (talk) 19:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I've removed it. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)^{T @} 23:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This should be merged with/redirected to Minds. The subject is not notable enough and there are hardly any secondary sources available that could be used. There's just not enough content for an article. Laval (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Not sufficiently notable for a standalone article. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]