This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Presidents Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Presidents of the United States (assessed as Low-importance). Alternative views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Barack Obama (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is notably lacking Hilary Clinton's role in launching the controversy by means of her comments during the Democratic Primary campaign against Barack Obama. The source of this claim and the facts and history should be added to this article. For example, a discussion is found here. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/sep/16/donald-trump/fact-checking-donald-trumps-claim-hillary-clinton-/ 2601:18F:E80:894B:ECC6:DB8B:A91E:ADA1 (talk) 11:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Origins_of_the_claims section? Here's another ref:[1] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

one thing that is actually missing is any mention of the Obama "turban photo" that his campaign alleged was spread by the Clinton campaign (and a broader contextualization of how the Clinton campaign at least passively hoped to profit from birtherism). (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/26/barackobama.uselections2008) jonas (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per your source, that seems to be about Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories, and it's mentioned there. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page auto-archives so fast that I may have missed something, but I can't find it in the index. Wouldn't, say, "Obama's religious affiliation" or "allegiance" be preferable to "Obama's religious preference" in the opening sentence? Mucketymuck (talk) 20:34, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, I removed most of the external links. The links are largely either already used as sources in the article, or otherwise unfit for inclusion due to reliability and usefulness concerns. The list remains archived in this article's history. Wracking ^talk! 20:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Joe_Arpaio

In the section dedicated to Joe Arpaio, the irrelevant feelings of a random staff writer from Salon; Alex Pareene, are mentioned: "I think we have long since passed the point at which I'd find this story believable in a fictional setting."

This is unnecessary/misplaced as it does not pertain specifically to Joe Arpaio but to how this writer feels about the birther conspiracy theory in general.

Highlighted link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Joe_Arpaio:~:text=Alex%20Pareene%2C%20a%20staff%20writer%20for%20Salon%2C%20wrote%20regarding%20a%20May%202012%20trip%20to%20Hawaii%20by%20Arpaio%27s%20people%20that%20%22I%20think%20we%20have%20long%20since%20passed%20the%20point%20at%20which%20I%27d%20find%20this%20story%20believable%20in%20a%20fictional%20setting.%22 Spike4111 (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Barry Soetoro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 24 § Barry Soetoro until a consensus is reached. BarntToust 22:52, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]