This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance). Poland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. European Union High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article needs to be updated and expanded to cover the changes PiS and Duda have made since their coming ito power. --1990'sguy (talk) 15:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The info about prime minister makes no sense here. Besides, there is only ONE prime minister. And yet some IP restored it in this edit. Why??? 85.193.219.160 (talk) 22:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a lot of vandalism and unexplained/unhelpful edits in this article recently. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Polski" link redirects to https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afera_gruntowa instead of https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrzej_Duda. Everything seems to be fine with https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9151911#sitelinks-wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.97.109.67 (talk) 18:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done. There was a wrongly formatted lang wikilink in the text. — kashmīrī ^TALK 05:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let's look at the "In July 2017, about 50,000 people demonstrated in Warsaw against changes in the justice system." - Number 50,000 has no source at all. Wikipedia has to remain factual so please refrain from posting content that lacks reliable source.

Another case is an outright lie with false reference. "In June 2016, Duda rejected appointing 10 judges selected by the National Council of the Judiciary of Poland.[34"
The reference: "Ewa Siedlecka, "Prezydent sądzi sędziów", Gazeta Wyborcza, p. 1, 29 June 2016" - this article was written in 2007 and refers to the different president.
Link to the copy of the article (as the original is no longer hosted by Gazeta Wyborcza): https://www.pressreader.com/poland/gazeta-wyborcza/20070901/281590941179440

I will review remaining references as it seems some of them are no longer online or simply incorrect.

Stance on LGBT rights section: On July 4, 2020, Duda proposed changing the constitution to ban LGBT couples from adopting children. On July 6, 2020, he signed a document with a presidential draft of the amendment to the Polish Constitution.^[1][2][3] --Centyja (talk) 14:06, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the text about Early Life and Personal Life need fusioned. (Anhaabaete (talk) 00:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Absolutely not. Early life refers to past events and personal life refers to current statuses and events since entering politics. Alex (talk) 18:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So will be good create a biography element head and this two inner element. Anhaabaete (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most of people will argee that article about Duda is baiased and mostly contains negative perseption of him. There no mentions of Duda's actions like: creating a award "Dla dobra wspólnego" which praises communities and oraganizations which are helping a socaity; not mansioning his dipolmatic actions Visegard Group, Vaimar Triangle creating Three seas iniciative, regular meetings with President Trump, his presence at opoening ceremony of Olympics 2022, many diplomatic vists (for example Duda is the first President to visit Australia and New Zeland) and his latest invovment in helping Ukraine with Russian confict; also there is lack of information about his domestic poiltics like nominations, vetos, legislation iniciative celebration of 100 yeras of Polish Independance a — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A31B:8342:6180:10DD:BC45:C7D6:6C18 (talk) 22:05, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I briefly modified "Before becoming president, Andrzej Duda was a member of the Polish Lower House" to "Before becoming president, Andrzej Duda served as a member of the Polish Lower House." to reflect WP:Lead Fugabus (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Over at 2022 Nord Stream pipeline sabotage a German WP:RS is being sourced for a claim that Duda had an agreement with Volodymyr Zelenskyy to sabotage the Nord Stream pipeline. I am unsure if the standard is different for a head-of-state, so does this meet our threshold for implicating a (pair of) WP:BLP in a serious crime? Thanks. Lklundin (talk) 07:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the long standing consensus image, discus here if it need be changed. Shadow4dark (talk) 08:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the current layout is a bit chaotic. IMO it should be structured akin to the POTUS' presidency sections, with domestic and foreign policy as separate categories with specific policies and issues described within. Right now "foreign policy" sticks out like a sore thumb in a weird mix of domestic issues sorted chronologically, each given a separate section when they probably should be subsumed into one: domestic policy. osuh (talk) 22:31, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How about making a chapter with a table of approval and disapproval ratings during his term? Just like in Opinion polling for the next Polish parliamentary election. Fabian S. (talk) 19:29, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]