Welcome to the assessment department of the Energy WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Energy or the people of Energy. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Energy}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Energy articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Energy WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Energy}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Energy
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

• FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class energy articles)
• A (adds articles to Category:A-Class energy articles)
• GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class energy articles)
• B (adds articles to Category:B-Class energy articles)
• C (adds articles to Category:C-Class energy articles)
• Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class energy articles)
• Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class energy articles)
• NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article energy pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed energy articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

• Heterojunction solar cell Has not been assessed since article was first approved through AfC. Significant changes made since, hoping for some feedback. Thanks 電放三葉 (RadioTrefoil) (talk) 01:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor-Major edits made , requesting reassessment. Thank you. TechnicolourKaleidoscope (talk) 08:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Champion Oil Field - Request Assessment. Thank you.
• Polymer-based battery - Substantially transformed article from a little blurb to a significant overview of this emerging class of batteries. Ala127
• Worldwide energy supply - Would like to know what to do to improve further. Rwbest (talk) 11:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Renewable Energy in Costa Rica - the article was substantially improved, including regulatory framework of the government of Costa Rica and references related to the state of the art in solar, geothermal and hydroelectricity projects in the country. I would like some feedback! Ceab.ico
• Energy policy of the European Union - the article is now hopelessly outdated, no longer deserves a B rating Gor
• Energy Technology Perspectives - Major rewrite, omited external source links, changed text to not appear as an advertisement.
• Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant - Major rewrite with new sources. Would like to know what to do to improve further. Apercu
• SG Biofuels - Improved from stub
• 2009 Russia–Ukraine gas dispute - Substantially reworked. Further suggestions and constructive criticism welcome.LokiiT (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Statoil Fuel & Retail - Article about a new company (spin-off from existing Fortune 50 company). Bifrost2 (talk) 23:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Dynamic tidal power - Page is not a stub anymore. Should be class B by now. Also, considering heavy emphasis by The Netherlands, European Commission and Chinese government, importance level should be raised to High or even Top. Will make further additions in coming weeks, to reflect recent developments. Keen to have an outside opinion. UNguyinChina
• Nationalization of oil supplies - Significantly improved and expanded by a policy class project last month. Is it B yet? 24.216.225.123 (talk) 19:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Aera Energy LLC - I've improved the citations. --Cmntgmry (talk) 15:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Dark Energy - Doesnt have an assesment please assess and give further suggestions to improve the article Naveed (talk) 06:25, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Dilbit - Another person removed the stub category, which is probably correct given recent changes. As I made a number of the substantive and format changes, I probably should not perform the re-assessment. --Rpclod (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Green Museum - A class worked on this article this semester, adding significant content. Review welcome! Sleuthwood (talk) 16:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant - Significant additions have been made to this article, would love comments on how to improve the article more.Castroby (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Solar cell efficiency - Made significant changes to article. Would like some feedback.Rob Hurt (talk) 02:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Systems for Nuclear Auxiliary Power - Article needs an initial assessment to determine what needs to be done to improve it.Graham1973 (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Thunder Bay Generating Station - Improved from stub, references added

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

• Samuel Armacost (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

• Draft:Fort Martin Power Station (talk) reassessed. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Mirama–Kabale High Voltage Power Line (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

• Category:Coal-fired power stations in Virginia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Donut Lab (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

• Joel Makower (talk) removed.

• File:Logo Plenitude.png (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Sastech AS (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

• Draft:Energy justice (talk) removed.
• Category:Power stations in Greenland (talk) removed.
• Draft:Stargate Hydrogen (talk) removed.

• Draft:Energy in Bangladesh (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Government-owned, contractor-operated (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
• Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and Energy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

• Draft:MEMS Power Generation (talk) removed.
• Pumangol (talk) removed.

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.