Back Storm Rider • Wikipedia talk:Article titles • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wikipedia talk:Article titles (Log · Page History)
User Storm Rider (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 36
Minor edits 1 (2.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 50.1
Added (bytes)2 34,992
Deleted (bytes) 0
Minor edits · 1 (2.8%)
Major edits · 35 (97.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 36 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 36 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2014-07-28 04:34 Diff · History 1,858 →What is the standing of an official name if a common name hasn't been proven?: what do you want to be called?
2010-02-06 01:36 Diff · History 1,610 →What's the real issue?: this is not rocket science.
2010-02-01 20:18 Diff · History 203 →RFC on proposed rename: agreed
2010-01-22 15:16 Diff · History 799 →Proposal: who is the expert?
2010-01-22 14:59 Diff · History 924 →Proposal: welcome to Orwell
2010-01-22 03:13 Diff · History 1,246 →Proposal: this is too scary; surely you don't really believe this drivel...do you?
2010-01-21 07:35 Diff · History 1,758 →Proposal: multiple edits; can you say red herring?
2010-01-21 00:51 Diff · History 876 →hope for resolution: insanity
2010-01-21 00:18 Diff · History 1,003 →Proposal: support
2010-01-20 01:36 Diff · History 672 →hope for resolution: plz, don't make us laugh. just provide the logic
2010-01-15 23:42 Diff · History 764 →examples: good question, let's ask why.
2010-01-13 03:25 Diff · History 448 →examples: too easy to misrepresent a months long arbitration that resulted in CC
2010-01-12 18:21 Diff · History 400 →Question re: "official" title with spelling error.: respect their choice
2010-01-12 18:16 Diff · History 2,173 →examples: the right of an entity to name itself should be respected
2010-01-12 03:39 Diff · History 2,000 →Self-identifying names controversy: examples and logic
2009-12-31 01:51 Diff · History 988 →random break: little minds or what?
2009-12-26 20:45 Diff · History 1,931 →random break: my, my, my, how the mice do play
2009-09-19 07:19 Diff · History 762 →Discussion re "most commonly used name": question
2009-09-18 07:53 Diff · History 495 →Accuracy counter-proposal: you really think readers don't find articles?
2009-09-17 16:55 Diff · History 266 →Accuracy counter-proposal: yes, yes, yes
2009-09-17 00:40 Diff · History 1,034 →Accuracy counter-proposal: agreed it is not common, but when it does arise, let's assist
2009-09-16 23:09 Diff · History 1,513 →Accuracy: let's look at what happened; you really have another explanation. Please help me understand it differently.
2009-09-16 22:55 Diff · History 1,088 →Accuracy: slow down, read, think, discuss; it saves time
2009-09-16 22:17 Diff · History 667 →Accuracy: verifiabiilty is impossible without reliable sources
2009-09-16 22:00 Diff · History 2 moving edit to proper section - edit conflict
2009-09-16 21:59 Diff · History 713 →Accuracy: when accuracy is not the objective, what is the value of a resource for knowledge? Credibility is immediately forfeit
2009-09-16 09:04 Diff · History 758 →Statement by User:Knepflerle: not a good example
2009-09-16 06:54 Diff · History 850 →Endorsed names: strongly disagree
2009-09-16 02:47 Diff · History 811 →Endorsed names: two cents
2009-09-15 20:31 Diff · History 955 →Name of articles: accurate source of knowledge to me is key
2009-09-15 20:23 Diff · History 578 →Statement by User:Knepflerle: Wikipedia has always been fluid
2009-09-15 01:35 Diff · History 181 →RfC: In WP:Naming Conventions, should the specific exceptions to "Use Common Name" be removed?: sign
2009-09-15 01:34 Diff · History 751 →RfC: In WP:Naming Conventions, should the specific exceptions to "Use Common Name" be removed?: response
2009-09-14 03:22 Diff · History 2,397 →Statement by User:Knepflerle: oppose
2009-09-14 03:04 Diff · History 408 →RfC: In WP:Naming Conventions, should the specific exceptions to "Use Common Name" be removed?: Focus on the discussion and not a single editor
2009-08-18 19:36 Diff · History 1,110 →Is there consensus for this or not?: few thoughts.
All times are in UTC.
No tags for this post.