Back Simonm223Antifa (United States) • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Antifa (United States) (Log · Page History)
User Simonm223 (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 44
Minor edits 3 (6.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits 20 (45.5%)
Reverted edits 4 (9.1%)
atbe1 52.3
Added (bytes)2 2,229
Deleted (bytes) -13,892
Minor edits · 3 (6.8%)
Major edits · 41 (93.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 20 (45.5%)
Manual edits · 24 (54.5%)
Reverted edits · 4 (9.1%)
Unreverted edits · 40 (90.9%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History -100 Undue
Diff · History -1 missed a triangle bracket in my prior edit.
Diff · History -1,166 Removing Klein as a source. I have also removed any statement that is sole-sourced to Klein. If a better source can be found that supports that statement we can discuss those on talk. I've provided justification, with multiple quotes from the Klein source, at talk why this is inappropriate as a source.
Diff · History -14 (reverted)  Undid revision 918210841 by MaximumIdeas (talk) does not accurately reflect the source. Stop that.
Diff · History -28 Undid revision 918204416 by MaximumIdeas (talk)unnecessary tag.
Diff · History -14 Undid revision 918002894 by FreedomGonzo (talk)WP:UNDUE WP:NPOV
Diff · History -707 Terminology: this is not a relevant or due interpretation of what "antifa" stands for. It's just some z-rate pundit's mouth noises.
Diff · History -52 Undid revision 913827330 by FULBERT (talk)Actually it's not.
Diff · History -24 Undid revision 910804325 by Mbsyl (talk) This accreditation is not necessary; nobody disputes that this was a hoax.
Diff · History -1,164 Concerns around WP:DUE and WP:NPOV by inserting weasel words by calling a source an antifa ally
Diff · History 18 (reverted)  Ideology and activities: no-platforming is arguably the tentpole of antifa action far more than fist fights, the word "platform" should be here for that reason if no other.
Diff · History -430 This is not notable antifa activism nor is it WP:DUE inclusion here. Wake us when Trump actually does something more than rile up his base on Twitter.
Diff · History -197 RV these WP:TEND edits - it should be clear you don't have consensus for this here.
Diff · History -94 Undid revision 907531233 by QuestFour (talk) Actually I think this version is better.
Diff · History -22 remove drive-by tagging. Editor who posted this seems uninterested in engaging at talk.
Diff · History 949 (reverted)  Please take it to talk and gain consensus before making these controversial changes.
Diff · History -1,169 Reverting these for multiple problems and suggest the user join us at talk where the Van Spronsen issue is under discussion.
Diff · History 6 ce
Diff · History -683 So many edit conflicts. NPOV cleanup, "antifa" is not a group with members, epoch times is not a reliable source, etc. etc. etc.
Diff · History -5 Undid revision 906390321 by QuestFour (talk) I think actually this is a more accurate description. I know it's splitting hairs, but it is clearer.
Diff · History -436 Undid revision 904512719 by Mcrt007 (talk) This is not a reliable source nor is it a notable incident. WP:CRUFT also applies.
Diff · History -3 Undid revision 875565865 by Wumbolo (talk) Concur it's inaccurate to separate direct action tactics from left-wing politics. It's a dispute over tactics rather than objectives being discussed here.
Diff · History 2 Notable street protests and violence: RM Weasel word
Diff · History 14 Notable street protests and violence: calling him a journalist is dubious. But he did found this particular racist tract publisher. Which helps contextualize why he was a target of an Antifa group.
Diff · History -1,300 Undid revision 868014317 by E.M.Gregory (talk) Antifa isn't a cohesive group which makes this particular para nonsensical. A loose political movement cannot collectively violate TOS.
Diff · History -243 (reverted)  Undid revision 867555515 by 154thTN Pvt. Seth Adam (talk) Revert clear vandalism.
Diff · History -1,533 I agree with Bob's assessment at talk that the whole sentence is a WP:NPOV and WP:DUE issue and should be reverted.
Diff · History 1,004 Undid revision 864785034 by DigbyDalton (talk) There's a reference for him being alt-right. If you dispute the reliability of the source take it to talk. If you have opposing sources please bring them to talk to assess their reliability.
Diff · History -30 Aside from a few notable mistakes (generally spotted by other Antifa activists) they're pretty good at sussing out the fascists they intend to confront. "Whom they believe to be" is a bit WP:WEASEL
Diff · History -5 grammar
Diff · History 93 Digital activism is a significant enough ANTIFA tactic that it should be in the lede. Including ref.
Diff · History -46 Undid revision 862279288 by Jizzy p (talk) No.
Diff · History -49 This article is specific to Antifa activity in the United States.
Diff · History -2,778 Section blanking WP:BOLDly on the basis of my argument on talk that this section contains nothing of lasting encyclopedic relevance as per WP:SUSTAINED and WP:DUE
Diff · History -92 Undid revision 857281352 by Josh Graze (talk) Every three days or so somebody puts a drive-by edit up adding this intermediate number when a lower and higher number are already provided. If you have a reason why you need three references to count tallies for this silly petition in the same paragraph explain it at talk.
Diff · History 43 Undid revision 857119215 by Spacemarine10 (talk) RV good faith edit but this shortening cuts important details, IE the disorganized nature of Antifa movements.
Diff · History -92 Undid revision 856337223 by Josh Graze (talk) I deleted that originally because we didn't need three updates on the total number of signatures. Please discuss before making whole-cloth reversions to an older version with no edit summaries.
Diff · History -1,263 Undid revision 855964582 by Thelastauroch (talk) That was far too substantial a restructuring to do as a single edit without discussion on a contentious page. I am not opposed to the editor restoring their non-controversial grammar and wikilink changes. But more significant restructuring should be discussed at talk piece-by-piece.
Diff · History -92 White House petition: It seems undue to refer to the number of signatures three times in two paragraphs. Shortening to the initial burst of signatories and then the last reliably sourced number of signatures. ~~~~
Diff · History -123 Undid revision 855585495 by 2001:8003:A89E:F700:5122:784A:8263:7D0A (talk)Ok, just stop.
Diff · History -78 Undid revision 855585049 by 2001:8003:A89E:F700:5122:784A:8263:7D0A (talk)RV IP vandalism again and I guess we need semi-protect put back on this article.
Diff · History -115 Undid revision 855584529 by 2001:8003:A89E:F700:5122:784A:8263:7D0A (talk) clear vandalism
Diff · History -1 Mainstream:
Diff · History 1,067 Response: change to response as per discussion.
All times are in UTC.
No tags for this post.