Back ErgzaySpaceX Starshield • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page SpaceX Starshield (Log · Page History)
User Ergzay (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 31
Minor edits 1 (3.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits 1 (3.2%)
Reverted edits 1 (3.2%)
atbe1 2.2
Added (bytes)2 1,907
Deleted (bytes) -32,445
Minor edits · 1 (3.2%)
Major edits · 30 (96.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 1 (3.2%)
Manual edits · 30 (96.8%)
Reverted edits · 1 (3.2%)
Unreverted edits · 30 (96.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History 4 Partial revert of some changes by Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) that changed the intended meaning
Diff · History 88 top:
Diff · History 15 Clarify that it is not a "program"
Diff · History -331 Undid revision 1232375585 by J.pshine5t (talk) None of the sources added call it a program
Diff · History 0 Ergzay moved page Starshield (program) to SpaceX Starshield over redirect: Starshield is not a "program".
Diff · History -7,520 Don't wholesale revert all the changes. They were all made with good reasoning as shown in the log. If you have issues with individual changes, revert those and we can discuss.
Diff · History 25 Cleanup to clarify that it's not the commercial service that's being used but the commercial satellite constellation that's being used and that she was only talking about the users supported under the program she heads
Diff · History 6 Starshield program: Eric Felt did not say this, it was an "also" not a "prefer"
Diff · History 1,056 Starshield program: Add new source on government use of starlink and plans for starshield acquisition
Diff · History 102 Starshield program: Cleanup unverifiable information and match content from Starlink article
Diff · History -225 This image long predates Starshield so is not related
Diff · History 28 WP:UNDUE so move out of heading, and remove things not claimed in the document, i.e. no mention of mutually assured destruction
Diff · History -133 top: Remove line that incorrectly represents the content in the source
Diff · History -7,403 Undid revision 1224521236 by Starwars54321 (talk) Revert changes by sock puppet account
Diff · History -7,403 (reverted)  No edits were "lost". Don't disguise a revert as labeling them "lost edits".
Diff · History 454 Manually restore what appears to be the edit that Suprabellum tried to make
Diff · History -8,653 Undid revision 1224414350 by Suprabellum (talk) Undo edits that accidentally reverted changes
Diff · History 30 Undid revision 1224414657 by Suprabellum (talk) Undo edits that accidentally reverted changes
Diff · History -138 Launches: Clarify
Diff · History -610 Launches: Remove bad twitter sources
Diff · History -92 Launches: This is WP:OR
Diff · History 8 Starshield program: This needs a citation, neither source specifies what he is leading
Diff · History 91 Starshield program: Clarify so there is no WP:SYNTH
Diff · History -3,611 History: This article is about starshield, not NDSA
Diff · History -1,370 Starshield program: Remove a bunch of unrelated SDA content and WP:SYNTH Anything unsourced pre-2020 is WP:SYNTH
Diff · History -162 Starshield program: The satellites were for the NRO, not SDA. Also, source is not related.
Diff · History -23 top: That is not what the source says
Diff · History -50 top: Content not in source
Diff · History -2,032 top: Removing content not related to starshield
Diff · History -9 top: "initial" is OR
Diff · History -83 No source specifies SpaceX as developing missile interceptors
All times are in UTC.
No tags for this post.