Back Appable • SpaceX • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page SpaceX (Log · Page History)
User Appable (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 38
Minor edits 6 (15.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits 6 (15.8%)
Reverted edits 1 (2.6%)
atbe1 23.7
Added (bytes)2 4,932
Deleted (bytes) -8,020
Minor edits · 6 (15.8%)
Major edits · 32 (84.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 6 (15.8%)
Manual edits · 32 (84.2%)
Reverted edits · 1 (2.6%)
Unreverted edits · 37 (97.4%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2017-08-06 23:42 Diff · History -277 rewrite for consistency - achievements should be short
2017-05-30 17:08 Diff · History 13 most powerful in operation, not in general
2017-03-19 11:41 Diff · History 1 A bit more precise to say "missions", as one of the failures did not occur during an actual launch
2017-03-19 11:40 Diff · History 4 a word
2016-12-23 00:51 Diff · History -269 feel free to rv, but I don't think anyone challenged rmv of fansites (discussions centered around value of social media, and three editors agreed that the websites were important)
2016-12-23 00:50 Diff · History 553 Reverted to revision 756050327 by Appable (talk): Based on talk page, three editors agree that for now external links should remain. (TW)
2016-12-21 18:28 Diff · History 51 No further information given; suggest we discuss on talk page. Elon Musk's twitter is not linked on SpaceX's website & has provided new info before; inclusion maximizes information per WP:ELIMINOFFICIAL
2016-09-04 02:10 Diff · History -2 Static fire test includes entire wet dress rehearsal, so propellant fill operation is part of the static fire
2016-04-22 16:57 Diff · History -3 Reverted good faith edits by Frmorrison: The reference indicates that Dragon was never programmed to deploy parachutes in such a scenario, so not an "issue" with the software but just missing that feature. (TW)
2016-02-03 19:56 Diff · History -2 Reverted good faith edits by 93.86.207.162: Have a source? No problem if you don't know how to include one, anyone can include it correctly if you have one - just that factual changes can be controversial w/o a source. (TW)
2015-09-28 14:41 Diff · History 32 update wording to fit with new cit
2015-09-28 14:39 Diff · History 231 +cit for update tag; cit taken from SpaceX private launch site
2015-07-24 05:30 Diff · History 22 Reverted good faith edits by 69.255.152.13 (talk): According to ref, o3b networks is correct. (TW)
2015-07-15 01:23 Diff · History -34 +cit for CN, rmv update after tag no longer required
2015-06-13 23:21 Diff · History -1,062 Rmv content that doesn't have to do with SpaceX history but makes the article seem very biased
2015-06-13 23:17 Diff · History 14 Combining sentences, version 2
2015-06-13 23:16 Diff · History -16 Combine sentence for flow
2015-06-12 01:37 Diff · History 7 Grammar in lead
2015-06-12 01:36 Diff · History -42 Reverted good faith edits by Arado (talk): Assumed because colonizing Mars would make life multiplanetary. (TW)
2015-06-11 14:43 Diff · History -506 Removing content that falls under a fan point of view
2015-06-09 16:22 Diff · History -6 →Commercial crew contracts:
2015-06-04 13:35 Diff · History -78 Remove uncited claim (the 80%-20% is not mentioned in the video but the source nearby makes it look like that claim is sourced)
2015-05-28 19:32 Diff · History 1,919 Right section
2015-05-28 19:31 Diff · History -1,919 Wrong section
2015-05-28 19:31 Diff · History 1,919 (reverted)  Added content on future contracts due to Air Force certification
2015-05-28 16:56 Diff · History -12 Reverted 1 edit by Vsmith (talk): Blocked user's contribution was useful. (TW)
2015-05-20 12:10 Diff · History 236 Moved Arianespace director statement closer to the rest of the Arianespace statements.
2015-05-18 19:21 Diff · History -3,787 Goals section trim (move to more relevant sections, remove redundant information, remove useless "fun fact" type information)
2015-05-18 19:04 Diff · History 798 move CN tag to unrefed claim (Raptor private funding), added cit from SpaceX reusable launch system development program as ref for private funding.
2015-05-18 17:05 Diff · History 261 Wikilinks don't mean inline citations are not required. The claim of being funded with private capital isn't supported. +cit for FH private capital claim, CN still on Raptor engine
2015-05-18 14:46 Diff · History 151 Noted the SDs have been tested
2015-05-18 14:43 Diff · History -4 verb tense
2015-05-18 14:40 Diff · History 8 cn
2015-05-15 14:46 Diff · History 270 Reference CN. If there's any more updated source that would be ideal, I know they exist but I couldn't find any quickly.
2015-05-15 14:43 Diff · History 297 Asof updates, ref'd a cn in lead
2015-05-04 04:36 Diff · History -1 American English to fit with rest of article
2015-02-19 15:45 Diff · History 20 Source on EELV-class vehicle needed, as far as I know it hasn't been certified or been stated that it will certainly be
2015-02-19 15:38 Diff · History 44 Added two more launches of F9, and a qualifying statement of 14 successes, 1 partial failure
All times are in UTC.
No tags for this post.