This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Croatia. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Croatia|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Croatia. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch
Scan for Croatia related AfDs

Scan for Croatia related Prods
Scan for Croatia related TfDs


Croatia

Hrkljuš (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional game related to former Yugoslavia, major WP:GNG issues. Very poorly referenced - current two sources are of dubious reliability and relevance (one of them is a review of a video game that presumably was inspired by this concept); my BEFORE fails to find anything substantial. It has articles in several languages related to that region, but they are as weak or weaker than what we have. If sources exist, they are probably not in English :( There is a chance that the aforementioned video game would be notable, and if so, this could be rewritten - but again, I don't expect this game would have reviews in English. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe Croatia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source assessment table here, none of the sources have demonstrated WP:GNG notability of this subject.

Source assessment table prepared by User:Bri
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Fansite, impossible to determine true independence No SPS fansite is presumed non-reliable No
~ Probably independent media, published by "CMD Media" with what appears to be a legitimate physical address in Zagreb. ~ Difficult to assess reliability of "online fashion portal"; article referenced is unsigned by any author. ~ The source discusses one year's event directly but with light detail. ~ Partial
Yes Jutarnji list is legitimate medium Yes Presumed reliable No Photos and light bios of some contestants in caption format; no significant detail wrt notability of the contest. No
Yes Presumed independent online media Yes Presumed reliable online media No Merely photos and captions, max 8 sentences. No significant detail wrt notability. No
Fansite, impossible to determine true independence No SPS fansite is presumed non-reliable (see consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources) Yes No
Yes Media source presumed to be independent. ~ Index.hr "online tabloid" not a first choice for encyclopedic reliability. No Four sentences about the pageant, three sentences about the country's contestant's "chiseled body". No significance wrt notability of the pageant. No
Yes Presumed independent online media Yes Presumed reliable online media No Tiny article about one contestant replacing another due to injury. No significance wrt notability. No
Fansite, impossible to determine independence No SPS fansite presumed non reliable No
Miss Universe Croatia instagram (source #7, #9 through 29, and #31 through 49)
No Org's own social media about the pageant they own Yes Social media presumed reliable for WP:ABOUTSELF statements such as factual note of year's pageant winners. No No Instagram post is detailed enough to support notability. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

The vast majority of the sources are the pageant's instagram or fansites; only two or three sources are legitimate media, and of those, there is no in-depth coverage. I have relied on some machine translation to assess, but it's apparent that most of the legitimate media stories are just photo spreads of attractive humans. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:38, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Others

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates

See also

No tags for this post.