This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete (had already been done) and ROFL. — Trilobite (Talk) 16:34, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedic. Delete. Ken 23:01, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Delete --DNicholls 23:02, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also: the redirect List of numbers ordered by google rating--DNicholls 23:05, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - pointless list - it will change tomorrow anyway --Doc (?) 23:04, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete oh lordy... -- Francs2000 | 23:05, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• This article is encyclopedic and gives valuable and interesting information. The google sequence of numbers is of technological and sociological significance. It is of interest to people wanting to research internet search engines, their mechanisms and their effects. It also gives a unique time-sensitive insight into the historical evolutionary development of Google's visible mechanics, and will be an important reference in years to come. Keep.
  • — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.252.0.6 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 26 July 2005
• I'd like to Speedy delete it, but, ok, I'll wait a bit. I have allready speedied some of this guys "artcles" and redirects (for instance a redirect from an article with the name being about the first 200 digits of pi...). Shanes 23:13, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete - Pointless, results are likely to change anytime and the complete list is infinite. This is wikipedia, not the church of Google worshippers. Fbergo 23:27, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• delete! -- Joolz 00:24, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete in agreement with the non-anonymous voters so far. Barno 01:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Kinser 02:46, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Why in the world...? humblefool® 03:01, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Paul August ☎ 03:32, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. --Trovatore 03:57, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Oleg Alexandrov 04:11, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete some of the weirdest shit I've seen in a long time... Cyclone49 04:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, useless article. — JIP | Talk 05:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, since 42 is missing. Samohyl Jan 10:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Ashmodai 12:49, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. linas 16:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• De-Google before our mirrors get it all over Google. --Idont Havaname 18:23, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Publish original research elsewhere. Dystopos 19:19, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.