The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2020–21 European Rugby Challenge Cup table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

merged with the parent article (2020–21 European Rugby Challenge Cup) Frietjes (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:17, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Blps (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely pointless template which is a wrapper of itself, which requires an additional bot edit to replace. Seeing that it still has the unsupported parameters in it, I don't think this is even used (haven't seen pages using this template added to the error categories recently). Gonnym (talk) 12:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't pointless when it was created, except someone deleted the documentation. It was intended to be a shortcut for adding the WPBio with living=yes template. In any case, if no one is using it, feel free to delete it, but not because it's "completely pointless". Legoktm (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is completely pointless in its current state as it not only doesn't add anything of value, but it also places the pages in error categories. I didn't comment on how the template was in 2012, so you should stop being offended by something unrelated to you. Gonnym (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not pointless but lost its use over time. The Banner talk 18:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Earth's location (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:LocationOfEarth-ImageMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Earth's location with Template:LocationOfEarth-ImageMap.
Not sure if this is the best template to merge to, but we already have many templates on this one here. Interstellarity (talk) 00:10, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose, the text template seems much easier to understand and navigate. Keeping these templates separate presents two ways of processing information. Unless they are merged in a very good navigational manner. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:14, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong oppose the image template is pointless and WP:ICONDECORATION violation. It should be a text-only template. An image-icon-link template violate accessibility and is needlessly heavyweight on resources, that could break the complexity limit on intricate pages. Thus these two templates should not merge. Consider deleting the ImageMap template instead. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment {{LocationOfEarth-ImageMap}} is only used in one article. Clearly a template that can be deleted, since it isn't useful, as templates should not be used only on one page -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Earth's location in the Universe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:LocationOfEarth-ImageMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Earth's location in the Universe with Template:LocationOfEarth-ImageMap.
Not sure if this is the best template to merge to, but we already have many templates on this one here. Interstellarity (talk) 00:09, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:14, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Directly transcluded onto multiple navboxes. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong oppose the image template is pointless and WP:ICONDECORATION violation. It should be a text-only template. An image-icon-link template violate accessibility and is needlessly heavyweight on resources, that could break the complexity limit on intricate pages. Thus these two templates should not merge. Consider deleting the ImageMap template instead. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:48, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment {{LocationOfEarth-ImageMap}} is only used in one article. Clearly a template that can be deleted, since it isn't useful, as templates should not be used only on one page -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:07, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 February 19. ✗plicit 14:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:OccupationNationality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.