For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RJShashwat/Archive.

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

• Syadwadi (talk ·  · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Account created after ParvatPrakash was blocked and is restoring their edits [1][2] - Ratnahastin (talk) 05:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk endorsed. MarioGom (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would say  Likely from an overall comparison against all previously blocked accounts, in particular against Goyama (talk · contribs), but also consider behavioural evidence as well. - Mailer Diablo 04:01, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Blocked and tagged On checkuser and behavioral evidence. See also related Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rizhwickh, for the opposing sock farm. DrKay (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]