| If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Moleman 9000}} to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here). |
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
- Moleman 9000 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Particleman24 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Marzillius (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Code letter: G
- Supporting evidence: This is being requested in conjunction with Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Particleman24.
Well, as it turns out, shortly after I file this report, Moleman is indef blocked for personal attacks [[1], but not before denying the statement of socking. Even tho he is indef'ed, I'd still like this case to move forward. Yngvarr (t) (c) 22:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Unrelated YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 08:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
You must be logged in to post a comment.