The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:23, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• America derangement syndrome → Anti-Americanism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Neither the word "derangement" nor the phrase "America derangement syndrome" are found anywhere on the target page. N2e (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep The meaning is clear and there are a fair number of ghits. It's not an important enough term to mention at the target page, but no one's going to be surprised to land there, so I don't think the lack of mention is particularly important. That said, it also isn't very important to have the redirect. I just don't find a strong argument to remove it. --Trovatore (talk) 00:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unclear what derangement is being sought out. Hyper-Americanism could be such -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The word derangement does not appear on the target page, and the topic is likely not notable in relation to this topic. Z. Patterson (talk) 05:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per Z. Patterson.--Boynamedsue (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete vague at best --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Teennick (Netherlands&Flanders) → Nickelodeon (Netherlands)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of it at the target. I nominated it for a db-x3 but it was reverted since it could instead/rather qualify for R3, but since this isn't recently created, though/although not plausible, I've listed it here. Intrisit (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. / RemoveRedSky ^{[talk] [gb]} 17:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:41, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Css2date → Template:End date  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Template:Cssdate → Template:Start date  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] Added 173.206.105.221 (talk) 06:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how "CSS" could mean "end". Nothing links to this template to give any additional indication. Gonnym (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

meta:Special:CentralAuth/Doncram appears to indicate the editor who created the redirect is deceased. The very short history of the template doesn't help me understand its purpose. Jc3s5h (talk) 18:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as confusing. Although {{start date/doc}} includes a hidden (by CSS) duplicate, machine-readable date, there are no incoming transclusions of it being used in a way that points that out or transclusions at all. 173.206.105.221 (talk) 06:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:41, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cho-Marisa → Characters of Touhou Project#Marisa Kirisame  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

it's likely that following the target's afd closing as redirect, its own redirects will eventually be automatically relinked, but until then, might as well check a few of them out again. for this one... uh... unmentioned, unnotable meme. gets surprisingly steady views (which is to say more than 0), evidently from people with good taste. google at your manhood's risk consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 17:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too specific. The actual Japanese name, Chō Marisa (超魔理沙), doesn't get a lot of traction either. — Nameless^(?) 07:02, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Folk colour → Philosophy of color  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I am nominating this redirect for deletion, as folk colour is not mentioned anywhere in the target article. Alternatively, it could be retargeted to an article I am unaware of that does mention it. drdr150 Yell at me Spy on me 17:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Google shows that non-reliable sources use "folk color" to mean colors derived from natural materials, or from homemade dyes and paints, which often come out looking somewhat faded and/or earth-toned. Google scholar shows a fair number of articles using the term in reference to colors used and preferred by specific cultures, such as China. There might be potential for an article, or at least a section, to be written about this topic, in which case WP:RETURNTORED applies. Alternatively, this might simply be ambiguous, since reliable sources use it to refer to the colors preferred by many different cultures, and the resulting pallets being discussed can vary wildly from each other. Either way, I think this one should probably be deleted. (I'm always open to arguments otherwise) Fieari (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• COM:AP → commons:commons:Patrol#Autopatrol  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not an encyclopedic topic or a normal search term for a reader. Fram (talk) 14:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 07:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. / RemoveRedSky ^{[talk] [gb]} 17:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• • Delete per nom.
  —  Kolano • talk 20:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 19:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:52, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Dismissal (employment). Jay 💬 15:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Firee → Fire  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

while likely a plausible typoo, "firee" as an actual word refers to someone who's been fired from their job. idk, retarget to termination of employment or something related to it (probably dismissal (employment))? consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to dismissal (employment), since that article covers involuntary termination specifically. I agree that the typo is a plausible one, but I can't find much evidence that it is common enough to warrant targeting the current target over a correct usage. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:01, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Presidentman. Enix150 (talk) 01:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to dismissal (employment) per Presidentman --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cbc high → Christian Brothers College High School  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Cbc high school → Christian Brothers College High School  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

These redirects were created in 2006 and were recently nominated for G6-error. Because of their age, I thought it would be worthwhile to discuss. Some issues I notice involve the capitalization (both the acronym and "high/high school"), incomplete name for Cbc high, and the potential for disambiguation. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment looking through the creator's contributions, there's also a CBC High redirect that should probably be included here as well. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{☎ Dinoguy1000} 11:46, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, "CBC High" is a common shortname for the school. Examples include: [1] [2][3]. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whether "CBC High" is a reasonable redirect to the school is a completely different question to whether "CBC High" should be included in this nomination. I have no opinion on the former, my opinion on the latter should be obvious from my first comment here. 「ディノ奴千？！」^{☎ Dinoguy1000} 05:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CBC High wouldn't have the capitalization 'issue' that the nominated redirects have. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the only motivation for this nomination, as was spelled out in plain English in the original comment, and "CBC High" matches the other two points (incomplete name and potential for disambiguation). 「ディノ奴千？！」^{☎ Dinoguy1000} 04:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, harmless. What potential for disambiguation is there? -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since CBC High exists and points to the same target. If disambiguation is needed, then make it a disambiguaiton page -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 05:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix. @Significa liberdade: What potential for disambiguation is there - a high Complete blood count, which won't be titled this way? Jay 💬 08:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi, @Jay and @Tavix: Looking at this again, I think it would make sense to redirect to Christian Brothers College, which is currently a disambiguation page. Although the Christian Brothers College High School page is the only page with "high school" in the title, many of the listed educational institutions are primarily or have secondary schools (i.e., junior and high schools), including Christian Brothers College, Adelaide; Christian Brothers College, Burwood; Christian Brothers College, Fremantle; Christian Brothers' College, Perth; Christian Brothers College, Rose Bay; Christian Brothers College, Cork; Christian Brothers College, Bulawayo; and Christian Brothers' College, Mount Edmund. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I would oppose that per your words: the only page with "high school" in the title, assuring that someone searching with this phrase would be looking for the Missouri school. Nevertheless, I've added a hatnote to that page which I hope would satiate your concern. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).