• Narutolovehinata5 (t · th · c ^{(template space · edit requests)} · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · templates created · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

I am a regular on WP:DYK and am interested in helping out with promoting preps to queues and pulling problematic hooks. I currently have thousands of edits to the Template userspace, largely in conjunction with DYK. It has been suggested that DYK regulars consider applying for template editor to help out with the queues and so I am making this request. To make things clear, I am at this time not planning to use the right for anything other than DYK-related purposes (meaning prep/queue work), so if the request is declined, I understand. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 16)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~55,000)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~11,000)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0?)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0?)

Comment: Should be fine based on extensive DYK experience. See also Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll/Archive 10 § Narutolovehinata5: July 26, 2018 endorsements based on DYK. – JensonSL (SilverLocust) 18:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on my long-term experience working with Narutolovehinata5 at DYK, I endorse their request. RoySmith (talk) 19:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cielquiparle (t · th · c ^{(template space · edit requests)} · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · templates created · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)⁽⁾

Interested in helping move prep sets to queue at DYK. Have promoted 500+ hooks at DYK. Am very aware of the need to thoroughly review each and every article that is being featured on the main page, and to question hooks that don't look right or can't be verified properly. Am aware of the review procedures at WT:DYK and at WP:ERRORS. (DYK needs all hands on deck at the moment.) Cielquiparle (talk) 13:59, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 3)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~37,000)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~3,000)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0?)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0?)

Comment: Should be fine based on extensive DYK experience. See also comment by RoySmith. – JensonSL (SilverLocust) 18:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on my long-term experience working with Cielquiparle at DYK, I endorse their request. RoySmith (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]