The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by Ucucha 22:47, 23 October 2011 [1].

IPhone 4S (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured article candidates/IPhone 4S/archive1
• Featured article candidates/IPhone 4S/archive2

Nominator(s): Zach Vega (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because it's had a lot of work done to it lately and I think it might be ready. I don't see any problems with it. Zach Vega (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - The phone just got released two weeks ago and that doesn't really make the article sable yet. As well, there should be more time for stuff like awards, criticism, and sales figures to be added before the idea of putting it at FAC can happen. GamerPro64 20:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I agree with GamerPro, plus I see many issues with prose and unreliable sourcing on a quick glance. I could do a full review, but I recommend withdrawal. Secret ^account 21:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Suggest withdrawal - would benefit from going through WP:GAN or WP:PR before FAC, largely per GamerPro and Secret. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawl - So, umm, I'll do that stuff. Zach Vega (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.