Alexfusco5

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Alexfusco5 (talk · contribs) I would like an editor review to see how the community thinks of me as a Wikipedia editor Alexfusco5 02:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

You have done an excellent job with anti-vandal work with over 50 reports to AIV. I encourage you to keep it up as well as the welcoming work. With over a thousand edits a month, you are a devoted editor. Great job. However, a few months ago, I recall you placed {{administrator}} on your userpage. However, that is no longer a problem. I would also reccommend more participation in WP:RFA and WP:XFDs. And please remember not to vote, but argue. I hope this helps.

I have given you additional questions. If you can answer them I can give you a more in depth review. Thanks!

After viewing your answers to the additional questions, I can see you know administrative jobs very well. However, the last CSD question was about WP:NOTABILITY. I would suggest you familiarize yourself with that policy more. I don't blame you, that indeed is the toughest policy to follow and many articles have been deleted due to that. Thanks! Marlith T/C 02:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the Readers Digest version

  • Chillax the userpage. Tone it down.
  • You revert a lot of vandalism, which is very good, but play around with editing the actual encyclopedia, it will be worthwhile.
  • When reverting vandalism, make sure the revert is reverting vandalism, not a mass improvement.
  • Listen to editors around you, particularly ones that have helped you in the past, they will be your allies.
  • Have fun.

--wpktsfs 18:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC) Comments [reply]

An entire paragraph in an article on H. Thaci cites no source. You should remove it.

Hashim Thaci also founded the "Drenica-Group" an underground organization that is estimated to have controlled between 10% and 15% of all criminal activities in Kosovo (smuggling arms, stolen cars, oil, cigarettes and prostitution). The Group relied on its close connection to the Albanian, Czech and Macedonian mafia; one of the most important factors in these connections being Thaci's sister's marriage to Sejdija Bajrush, one of the largest Albanian mafia leaders. One of the group's first military activities in Kosovo was the May 25 1993 attack on the railroad crossing in Glogovac in central Kosovo, when a band composed out of Thaci and his closest Drenica friends, Rafet Rama, Jakup Nuri, Sami Ljustku and Ilijaz Kadriju; killed four Serbian policemen and severely wounded three. On 17th June 1996 Thaci and several other members of the KLA opened fire on a Serbian police car in Sipolje in northern Kosovo, on the Kosovar Mitrovica-Pec road. Later the same year another unit under Thaci threw hand grenades into the Serbian military barracks "Miloš Obilić" in Vučitrn in central Kosovo.

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    On Wikipedia, my best work is reverting vandalism and updating market share in Internet Explorer articles. I recently started getting involved in welcoming new users to Wikipedia and new page patrolling. When patrolling new pages I try to add templates to the page to help get the article some attention. Alexfusco5 03:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    As with all editors sometimes I get into conflicts. To deal with them I try to calmly explain to the editor why I made that change and try to work out a way to make both of us happy (except in the case of obvious vandalism) I always try to make the editor understand why I reverted his/her edit(s) or made that change. Alexfusco5 03:10, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Questions from Marlith T/C 01:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Delete or not:

  1. CSD1 YES
  2. CSD2 YES
  3. CSD3 NO
  4. CSD4 YES
  5. CSD5 NO

Vandalism or or not:

  1. [1] NOT VANDALISM GOOD FAITH
  2. [2] VANDALISM
  3. [3] TEST EDITS
  4. [4] NOT VANDALISM REMOVAL OF NONSENSE SECTION
  5. [5] NOT VANDALISM GOOD FAITH
  6. [6] NOT VANDALISM GOOD FAITH

Have fun! Marlith T/C 01:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_review/Alexfusco5
No tags for this post.