< October 5 October 7 >

October 6

Category:Hawke's Bay

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Jafeluv (talk) 10:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Hawke's Bay to Category:Hawke's Bay Region
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Per other recent renames of categories for New Zealand regions, and per Hawke's Bay Region. There's also the potential added confusion that people might think of the bay itself (even though that is actually Hawke Bay). I'm also including the following subcategories in the nomination:
Grutness...wha? 00:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taranaki

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Jafeluv (talk) 10:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Taranaki to Category:Taranaki Region
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Per other recent renames of categories for New Zealand regions, and per Taranaki Region. There's also the added confusion with Taranaki that it can be used as a name (by itself) for the prominent mountain in the region. I'm also including the following subcategories in the nomination:
Grutness...wha? 23:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rides at The Great Escape & Splashwater Kingdom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:29, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:Rides at The Great Escape & Splashwater Kingdom to Category:Six Flags roller coasters
Nominator's rationale: Unneeded category as no other Six Flags parks have a category like this. I suggest upmerging the roller coasters to "Six Flags roller coasters" and then deleting this category. Tavix |  Talk  23:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shopping malls in Las Vegas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Jafeluv (talk) 10:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Shopping malls in Las Vegas to Category:Shopping malls in Las Vegas, Nevada
Nominator's rationale: Rename. To match the parent category, Category:Buildings and structures in Las Vegas, Nevada. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Verizon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Jafeluv (talk) 10:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Verizon to Category:Verizon Communications
Nominator's rationale: Rename. To match company name. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Blackpool media

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: result. For the UK, this appears to be the most common form, so a rename is not out of order. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:34, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Blackpool media to Category:Media in Blackpool
Nominator's rationale: Per Category:Media in Lancashire and it's other subcats. Small-town hero (talk) 20:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Salanoia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge. Jafeluv (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:Salanoia to Category:Euplerids
Nominator's rationale: Merge into Category:Euplerids: There is only one article in this category, and there is no potential for growth. Other small genera in the same order do not have their own categories either (see Category:Carnivores and subcategories). Ucucha 19:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Someone needs to describe a second species or a taxonomic revision needs to take place before this category can have a second member. I would assert that this will not be a controversial proposal - the category was bot-created after all - and it might be speedied. --Aranae (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Serjeants-at-Arms in the United Kingdom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Serjeants-at-Arms in the United Kingdom to Category:Serjeants-at-Arms of the British House of Commons
Nominator's rationale: Rename. To match the relevant article Serjeant-at-Arms of the British House of Commons, since that's who the articles in the cat refer to. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Epics to epic poems

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename all. (This time I'll avoid making an unexpected assignment for Debresser to complete.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename to match main topic article epic poetry and recently renamed parent category Category:Epic poems. The word "epic" is imprecise and more colloquial than "epic poem". The previous discussion is here. See also related proposal below. Jafeluv (talk) 12:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient Greek comic epics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename to Category:Ancient Greek mock-heroic poems. On-the-fly consensus. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Ancient Greek comic epics into Category:Ancient Greek epics
Nominator's rationale: Merge. With the parent category at 11 articles and this one at 2, it seems unnecessary to have a separate subcategory for comic epics. Note that the merge target is nominated for renaming above. If there's no consensus to merge, consider renaming to match the above categories. Jafeluv (talk) 12:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We have mock-epic (as redirect), which mentions one of these. I don't really follow your logic. Slightly ridiculously, MacFlecknoe, among the most famous mock-epics in English, is categorized as an "Epic poem", as is The Rape of the Lock. There could hardly be any objection to setting up a tree - I might do so if I have time. Johnbod (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Slovenian newspapers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename; anyone can also create Category:Slovene-language newspapers if desired. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Slovenian newspapers to Category:Newspapers published in Slovenia
Nominator's rationale: Rename. This was a disputed speedy request. Rename to the standard for Category:Newspapers by country and additionally create Category:Slovene-language newspapers to cover such newspapers as Kmetijske in rokodelske novice. Tassedethe (talk) 09:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Beatles songs in surround

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:The Beatles songs in surround ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. I'm not 100% sure what this means or is, but it appears to be something about sub-categorizing Beatles songs according to certain recording technology and is overcategorization in my view. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – surround sound perhaps, but nothing to do with the song. Occuli (talk) 10:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The 31 songs in this list is merely a beginning, the full list will be at least twice as long, and all of these songs are in 5.1 surround. Mind you, in each article there is a section entitled “Surround version(s)”, where you can read in which Beatles release you will find the surround version. And please stop the nonsense about recording techniques, this has to do with mixing and presenting, and hearing and enjoying. If you can’t do the latter, get yourselves a home theater and the Love album and some Beatles DVDs, and you will know what this is all about. Apanuggpak (talk) 22:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Transferred from Oct 7, where this comment had been left as a "new nomination". BencherliteTalk 22:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, if I understand Apanuggpak correctly, these aren't to separate songs originally released in surround sound from those that weren't, but rather for songs that were only recently released in a remixed, surround sound version on the album Love in 2006. So this isn't an original or intrinsic feature of the song. Nor is there apparently any other category for songs released in surround sound. Postdlf (talk) 02:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Pitbull categories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Jafeluv (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming:
Nominator's rationale: Rename. To match parent article, Pitbull (rapper), since pitbull leads to a disambiguation page. Also needs to be clarified, as the songs and albums aren't about the terrier. — ξxplicit 04:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And here I thought they were supposed to be categorizing songs and albums by the dogs ;) — Bellhalla (talk) 13:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Roller coasters in Los Angeles, California

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:
Suggest merging Category:Roller coasters in Los Angeles, California to Category:Roller coasters in California
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge because this category is a pointless branch of the "Roller coasters in California" category. This is also the only "Roller coaster by city" category in California. Tavix |  Talk  00:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest renaming Category:Roller coasters at Disneyland to Category:Roller coasters at Disneyland Park (Anaheim) per the article Disneyland Park (Anaheim) and its siblings in Category:Disney roller coasters. Occuli (talk) 10:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_October_6
No tags for this post.