The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Little Big Adventure 2. Stifle (talk) 08:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zeelich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Zeelich has no substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources, thus failing WP:N. No reliable third-party sources exist at all, and so the article probably can't meet WP:V either. Randomran (talk) 16:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete it, though a bold redirect might be a good idea. While I doubt it's going to come up as a search term, you never know. --Izno (talk) 23:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Not worth a full article, but no argument given why a redirect or merge is inappropriate.DGG (talk) 01:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Little Big Adventure 2 per lack of verifiable sources as well as consisting of exclusively original research. However, plausible search term. MuZemike (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.