The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering Repair! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game. Article has existed since 2008 without establishing notability. User:DGG declined the proposed deletion, saying "can be expanded from Japanese WP", but the Japanese article does not establish notability either. Atlantima (talk) 14:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Atlantima (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Atlantima (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Clearly fails WP:GNG in the total absence of third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage, and as mentioned above, the Japanese Wikipedia article offers no additional references or sourcing that could be used to salvage this article. --DAJF (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.