The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ffm 00:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Dog (Time Crisis) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Time Crisis (series)#Characters as it cannot stand as an article itself. Pie is good ^{(Apple is the best)} 20:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or redirect The notability arguement is inherently false, as this is the only game character to have appeared in every incarnation of the game, however your grounds of OR and to a greater extent RS are very much a valid reason to delete. I prefer to see the article kept, preferable as its current idependent self, however I am open to merging if the community decides that the merge would be in the best interst of the encyclopedia. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge although major characters should generally have an article, this is the only major character in the series, and could properly be merged. The N argument is irrelevant if one merges, of course. And in any case, a redirect from the names of at least major characters is essential. DGG (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Ilikepie. Stifle (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge per everyone. Needs to exist in some capacity. --63.3.1.130 (talk) 14:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as merging will only make the "Time Crisis Characters" page about 70KB in length (which is going to be a bit too long). 71.57.74.109 (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.