The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 01:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vortex life form (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is an in-universe repetition of the plot of the Ecco the Dolphin article. As such, it is duplicative and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no reliable sources. Blast Ulna (talk) 06:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 08:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Summarization of elements in the plot which have not received significant coverage from reliable independent sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - current content is completely in-universe, failing WP:WAF. Asserts no notability through non-trivial coverage by reliable verifiable sources independent of the topic. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 03:05, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as faliure of WP:WAF guidelines. Marasmusine (talk) 07:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.