The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uplike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. It's already been prodded and deleted. Another user attempted to prod it again after its restoration, which was declined, but they never brought it to AfD. It may be worth pointing out that the obviously biased creator is a blocked sock. I see the article was also rather uncontroversially deleted from French Wikipedia a few years ago, slightly after the most recent prod attempt in enwiki (their notability guidelines seem about the same as ours), and it doesn't appear to have gotten any additional coverage since that discussion. — Anonymous 21:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Products, Technology, and France. — Anonymous 21:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing found in google news, google books, or newspapers.com. I added wayback machine links to two of the broken ones in case anyone else wants to do a formal source analysis, but I don't see any that check all the boxes for WP:SIRS. Most are write-ups of a few hundred words as you would expect for any start-up at a trade show/expo. [4] is a bit more detailed, but it's on what appears to be a blog that contains affiliate links. I found a few other sources: the app caught the attention of Twitter's official blog in 2015[1], the founder was interviewed in a French business journal in 2015[2], and the app was reviewed in a startup news site in 2016.[3]. Altogether though, I don't think subject meets WP:NCORP. Zzz plant (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. : As per nomination. Doesn't meet WP: NCORP ......Gauravs 51 (talk)

• Delete not meet GNG. --Loewstisch (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The StartUpBeat review linked in Zzz plant's thorough search above said "It’s not going to win awards for originality" and I am seeing nothing in the article/references to indicate more than a run-of-the-mill startup proposition. Nor does the pivot to Botnation chatbots seem any more notable. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per nomination. Doesn't meet WP:CORP. WikiMentor01 (talk) 09:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.