The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete as blatant misinformation. Davewild (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tubby Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Glitches aren't really that notable. This glitch hasn't been the source of significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Fails WP:V through a Google search for notability. No References. -- Darth Mike  (join the dark side) 01:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Speedy Delete as a hoax. The screenshot is a photoshop, I can tell from the pixels and having seen a great many 'shops in my lifetime. A quick Google search [1]brings up one relevant page: the article itself. ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 14:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • I have placed the hoax template on the page per above comment. No comment on AfD otherwise. KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Appears to clearly be a hoax fuzzy510 (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete (G3) as blatant misinformation, which construes as pure vandalism. Yeah, the linked image is definitely a Photoshop–forgery. MuZemike 22:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per above. Clear photoshopping of the supposed screen shot: see that the pixels in the image on the left of the screen are larger than those contained in the image of Pikachu. Also the text in the area at the bottom has smaller pixels than either of them: text that detailed could only be produced on a 256-pixel wide screen, whereas the gameboy had a 160-pixel wide display. JulesH (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - Blatant hoax, potentially G3. Adding db tag now. — neuro^(talk) 13:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.