The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Einstein family. Strong consensus against keeping this page, which after having a look I concur with. Some difference of opinion on whether to merge or simply delete. I am splitting the difference. The man's name is mentioned in the family article, but absent some further claim to notability he seems unlikely to warrant further coverage. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Martin Einstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited. Doesn't appear to pass GNG. Bledwith (talk) 13:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CommentWP:OTHER why merge? this guy is not notable in any respect other then bring descended from Einstein.Bledwith (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CommentAgain, why merge? this guy is not notable in any respect other then bring descended from Einstein. there's no reason to include him in he family article (which is a complete mess in and of itself)Bledwith (talk) 08:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No tags for this post.