The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tallaght FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was no consensus, but neither editor who argued for keep explained how it meets WP:NOTABILITY. I couldn't find a way it does - the coverage and significance aren't there. Boleyn (talk) 21:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (or, failing that, merge/redirect to CRAOL). Per WP:NRADIO, the notability of radio stations is often "established by either a large audience, established broadcast history, or being the originator of some programming". In terms of the latter ("original programming"), while I found/added a small number of references to support the basic text/assertions, I could find nothing about the programming created/broadcast by the subject. In terms of the former ("large audience"), as part of the same WP:BEFORE exercise, I could find no refs to establish listenership or marketshare. In terms of the remaining criteria ("established broadcast history"), and while I appreciate that it's entirely subjective, I'm not sure that <10 years is an especially "established history". When compared to other small/long-established/community radio projects. I tend to agree with the nominator. I'm not sure the subject/title meets the criteria here. If we do retain the title, the (frankly very limited) supportable content could easily be covered in the CRAOL article. Guliolopez (talk) 09:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Guliolopez.4meter4 (talk) 13:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.