The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as G11 - non-admin closure. SpecialK18:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Switchboard as a service (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Blatant spam, not notable, no relevant sources, essentially a recreation of the GoHello article by the same author (talk) on the same day as it was speedied as a G11 following an AfD debate. AfD'ing this one as well because the author has a history of deleting db tags and would likely contest a prod. samj (talk) 07:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: the nomination is for a Speedy Delete samj (talk) 07:41, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete clearly an advertisement which also fails Notability. Bidgee (talk) 08:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No relevant reliable sources. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 08:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Neutral leaning towards delete I originally tagged it for various improvements but, not understanding the industry figured I'd leave it up to the more knowledgeable to improve. It reaks of an advert for something but, I wasn't sure if it wasn't just really bad writing. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, coatrack spam, and the recreation of a deleted article under a new title. Abysmally written in spam-style to the point of unintelligibility. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.