The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Salvio ^giuliano 21:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SupplyHouse.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article looks to fail wp:org citations apear to be limited to non-independent or routine coverage. From looking I have been unable to find independent secondary coverage but I have been able to find press-releases (new facility, fires etc.) and sponsered guides.

Previously tagged for A7 as I couldn't see a claim for notability - declining admin recommended AfD Carver1889 (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Carver1889 (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 21:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sources as all ROUTINE, promo, nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  05:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.