The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stanford–USC football rivalry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable article to be hosted on an encyclopedia such as Wikipedia Mohammad Hossain 01:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Keep. The current article is sketchy and recentist (Stanford and USC have played almost 100 times) but there is certainly a rivalry, as attested by such reliable sources as ESPN.com ("USC-Stanford: Still spicy after all the years), USAToday ("Southern Cal, Stanford a real rivalry"), and Yahoo! Sports ("The Absurdity of Rivalry: A history of Stanford and USC's insane 7-year battle"). --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Switched to "keep" per comment below. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The Yahoo! Sports article is a rehash of an SBNAtion.com user-submitted blog piece -- not a reliable source per WP:RS. Yahoo often recycles user-submitted material from affiliated sports blogs because it's free content. Beware: not professional sports writers or journalists. If I'm using user-submitted blogs, I can find several sources that say every Division FBS game series is a "rivalry." Our standard is a little higher than that. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Meets WP:GNG per sources identified by Arxiloxos. There's also "Tim Kawakami: Stanford-USC football rivalry more friendly" The San Jose Mercury News.—Bagumba (talk) 06:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but agree with commenter: way too recentist. The history goes much, much further back. However, we have to start somewhere. Let's see if we can get this expanded before we delete. --Esprqii (talk) 14:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: Esprqii and I have each added substantial content and sources to the article[1], which now, in my opinion, clearly demonstrates the notability of this old rivalry. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I have not had the time to do the WP:BEFORE due diligence required to determine the notability of the Stanford-USC game series as a rivalry, but per WP:NRIVALRY, no sports rivalry is inherently notable, and every sports "rivalry" must satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG. That means significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources explicitly covering the series as a rivalry, not merely as a recurring game series. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.