The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 02:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Vengeance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable game: a small player/developer community (a forum with < 90 members source), a "growing number" of players (only 55 that have completed a multiplayer game source). It has also been nominated and deleted before for non-notability reasons. The developer has also been deleted for non-notability reasons. Simeon (talk) 18:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The TigSource article already present in the article, by Derek Yu, is reliable IMO since it's penned by a noted indie game developer, but it's hardly a substantial piece. That is the only reliable source I've found when looking for more, most are mentions or listings on shareware sites. It doesn't meet notability because it is not the subject of multiple independent reviews which can be deemed reliable by WP standards. Someoneanother 01:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comments The only review sources so far I can find for this game:

1. TIGSource <-- This is the most reliable
2. Puppybuckets Review <-- This source is quoted in TIGSource by Derek Yu
3. Galaxiae
4. HyperMap Solar Vengeance Mod --Karho.Yau (talk) 04:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - has not attracted enough significant, reliable coverage to support an article. Marasmusine (talk) 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.