The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 10:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scientists and Engineers for America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of continuing (or past) notability. Sources are now unavailable and archived sources do not support notability. – S. Rich (talk) 04:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Science, and Websites. – S. Rich (talk) 04:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The coverage in Seed and the New York Times is probably enough on its own merits, and more could be added, like [1][2][3][4] and also [5][6]. The New Yorker describes them as having been active for "several years" [7]. XOR'easter (talk) 22:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but it reads like advertisement. --95.117.31.251 (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there is coverage to meet WP:GNG, but there is also some WP:PROMO. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.