The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep / nom withdrawn. Clearly my BEFORE was broken. Star Mississippi 00:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SME Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a long standing company, but outside of this source about whose standing as a reliable source I'm unclear, I'm unable to find anything to meet the depth required for WP:ORG. In the article and a BEFORE revealed run of the mill announcements to be expected of a 75 year old company/ Star Mississippi 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Courtesy @Ron Ritzman and DGG: as PROD/speedy decliners. Star Mississippi 20:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Home Theater Review is a perfectly respectable source. The question is whether sources exist, not whether they are available online. Rathfelder (talk) 23:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I also agree that Home Theare Review is a good in-depth article. I found 3 more citations in Google Books and have added them. MartinWilder (talk) 03:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. they probably are notable as developers of a very important standard in the field DGG ( talk ) 05:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep enough citations was provided by above voters. Brayan ocaner (talk) 00:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.