The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Nicholson, Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perhaps estimable but not demonstrably notable person; sources not sufficient for BLP; blp-prod declined. PhGustaf (talk) 05:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The references are a mess, and this is forgivable given that this is User:Columbia Student's first article. But even if everything in the text were fully documented, this is not a notable person. PhGustaf (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete His best claim to notability appears to be as drought coordinator for NYC, which could be a major position during a drought, but I couldn't find any coverage of him doing this or of the position itself Vartanza (talk) 02:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.