The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Human penis size. Article has been merged by its creator. (non-admin closure) FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Esquivel Cabrera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Single sourced WP:BLP of a person notable only for having a really big penis. Nothing in Wikipedia's notability guidelines confers a special inclusion freebie on people for the size of their body parts in and of itself, and with only one source here he fails to pass WP:GNG. This kind of thing poses WP:BLPPRIVACY issues when the subject is not otherwise a public figure, so we shouldn't be doing it. Bearcat (talk) 03:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - pretty much WP:BLP1E. shoy (reactions) 14:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete extreme case of non-notable trivia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• As the article creator, I'd be open to a SMERGE into Human penis size. I feel the Human penis size article, due to its own subject matter, ought to include a brief mention of who has (or claims to have) the world record. But it's possible that Cabrera might not be notable enough for his own article yet. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 06:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • FiredanceThroughTheNight you may do this already without waiting for an outcome of this AfD. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Okay, I will. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Human penis size. Probably just create a subsection Notable case of anomalies or something like this. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.