The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quinta Essentia (Video Game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is an indie game with no coverage. It absolutely fails the notability requirements laid out at WP:NOTE. No reliable secondary sources means no article. It is impossible to write an article which conforms to wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crossmr (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 12:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless sources can be shown demonstrating notability, having no luck coming up with any. Someoneanother 15:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless it establishes notability. Bart133 ^{t c @ How's my driving?} 01:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — I cannot find any verifiable, third-party sources that establishes any notability. MuZemike (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.