The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Quest (gaming). Icewedge (talk) 06:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quest chain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article was prodded, and prod was deleted, so taking it to AFD. Article appears to have little or no content beyond what could appear (or appears) in other more notable articles. Plastikspork (talk) 22:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Update: I now vote to redirect to Quest (gaming) as suggested. Plastikspork (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 04:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Dictdef of the "[Foo bar] is a [bar] which is [foo]" sort. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 05:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a non-notable neologism (oh I do love that phrase). Ironholds (talk) 05:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Quest (gaming) which already has more information about this subject than is in this article. JulesH (talk) 08:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Thanks for finding a suitable place to redirect this article. If I would have found that earlier, I probably would have been WP:BOLD and just done it rather than taking this to AFD. If someone wants to speedy close this article and do it (or I can do it), that would be fine by me. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect As per suggestion by JulesH. --Beligaronia (talk) 08:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - to Quest (gaming), especially since nom agrees. — neuro^(talk) 00:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as per julesH and beligaronia. Ikip (talk) 04:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.