The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pulp and paper industry in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough encyclopedic information or reference Greatder (talk) 19:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Greatder (talk) 19:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Afd is not for cleanup, and its current state is not a valid reason for deletion. It's a significant enough industry for sources to be findable, e.g. section 2 ("Indian Paper Industry") of "Opportunities for Green Chemistry Initiatives: Pulp and Paper Industry", "With a CAGR of 8%, country witnessing solid growth in pulp and paper". Clarityfiend (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Clarityfiend. A shame that the article is currently in such bad shape, but the industry definitely seems notable. It has industry publications [1], industry bodies [2] [3], and has received plenty of coverage as an industry in reliable sources - [4] [5] [6] [7] are a few examples. There are also tons of sources about the history of paper manufacturing in India [8] [9] [10] [11] and about the environmental impacts of the industry [12] [13] [14]. I don't think it would be too difficult to get this article looking much more like Pulp and paper industry in Indonesia, which seems to have a roughly similar level of available sourcing. MCE89 (talk) 23:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per MCE89. Bearian (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.