The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I am discounting the "this seems notable" vote, as there was no evidence of notability provided. The article currently has one reference, and it is to a primary source, so the nom's deletion rationale is valid. ST47 (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Podcast Producer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep there are many applications and products in the apple graveyard that have wikipedia articles. this seems notable, hence my vote. Fifthavenuebrands (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid rationale. --Darth Mike^(talk) 15:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.