The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pikmin 3 hints (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Rgoodermote  23:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Hey guess what guyz, Pikmin 4 will has pink pikmin!!!!!!!11!!!!!!1! (yeah, not really) Tavix (talk) 23:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Redirect to Pikmin (series)#Pikmin 3 Gary King (talk) 02:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, per above. SharkD (talk) 02:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete SharkD (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per nom. Salavat (talk) 04:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Changing from redirect to delete based on the comments by Tavix. Salavat (talk) 03:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — Definitely crystalballery. I cannot see a redirect doing much in this case. Who is going to search for "Pikmin 3 hints" when all they need to do is search for "Pikmin 3"? MuZemike 04:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: I have a STRONG disagreement with a redirect. No one is going to search for "Pikmin 3 hints" and keeping the history of the article makes it beg for recreation. Tavix (talk) 05:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Ah, that's a good point. In this case redirection wouldn't be sensible. SharkD (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - article content is a an assortment of speculation -- Whpq (talk) 13:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Someone looking for info about this would much soon type Pikmin 3 that Pikmin 3 hints. It is not a likely search term nor do we have similar redirects for other games either. --76.69.168.216 (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (non-searchable name) after moving any reliable informatin that's not speculation into the Pikman series article (or Pikman 2). --MASEM 13:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Delete", "move"? Sounds like a WP:MAD problem. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Snowball? Plastikspork (talk) 04:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately, an attempt by students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison to break Michigan Tech's world record for the largest ever snowball fight has failed. MuZemike 17:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Pikmin (series). There's suitable content for wikipedia and no reason to require delete and keeping the redirect is not unreasonable. Is a content fork, for which (re)merge and redirect is easiest and best solution and there was no need for this AfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.