The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peechoho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could find no evidenc that they meet WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 18:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete After extensive searching, a couple news articles but not enough sources to keep. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While it is easy to find people with this surname (both spellings), I cannot find sources (except mirrors of this old article) supporting the idea that they are a tribe/clan, let alone that they are a notable one.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; this might someday achieve requisite notability, but for now not enough for it to be here.—TripWire ︢ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︢ ︡ ︡ ︢ ︡  ^ʞlɐʇ 20:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.