The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Dorrego (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not properly referenced article, edited by 6 WP:Single-purpose accounts. Seems promotional; WP:NOTABILITY not established. Boleyn (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete Appears to be promotional. ❤ Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Totally promotional, not notable. Icarus of old (talk) 15:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Does not seem to meet notability criteria. Hoverfish Talk 22:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.