The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Lefevre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only sections of this article that is sourced are the lead and Media. None of the sources are reliable. fuzzable.com, written by Kelly McFarland fails to distinguish between advertising and editorial. See for example https://fuzzable.com/feel-good-this-january-with-pukka-tea/. tyler-penske.people.msnbc.com is a fake news source. His profile pic is a stock photo.[1] The content is not by MSNBC but by kivodaily, which we have blacklisted. The bio on borderlesslive.com looks like it was supplied by Lefevre, not independent news. The article published by euronews.com is by the subject. Accesswire.com is not reliable, it issues press releases created by a PR firm. The most egregiously wrong claim is that "In 2018, she was chosen as The Editor's Pick of the Best New Influencers at MSNBC." This is false. She was "Our Editor’s Pick of the Best New Influencer" at kivodaily. Vexations (talk) 13:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I tried the "before" search. She gets mentions in some articles about society parties but is otherwise mentioned only as someone's girlfriend. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Agree with the above. All coverage seems to be in tabloids. Not to mention the article is complete puffery and should have been CSDd months ago. PK650 (talk) 22:44, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – I love love love my celebutants but she doesn't pass the bill. I learned she likes bikinis...fails GNG. Missvain (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The nominator has thoroughly analysed the sources in the article, and my searches turn up nothing better. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.