The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nargis Khattak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The only web sources I could find are mostly focussed on this movement PTM. I cant find many reliable sources that are independent of this subject. The coverage that exists for this person consist mostly of routine coverage of the movement and a few articles regarding his arrest. But certainly "significant coverage" does not exist, which is a key requirement in meeting WP:GNG Kami2018 (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kami2018 (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Kami2018 (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Kami2018 (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as it seems a well sourced article about a notable personality. Khestwol (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• As a side note, as I have written before, the nom Kami2018, who is mass reporting Pashtun articles for deletion, has disruptively edited articles about Pashtuns in the past and was recently given "last warning" on his talk page twice for removing sourced content from various related articles. Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• In response to this accusation of Kami2018 allegedly acting "disruptively," interested editors may want to check this. Kami2018's edits were all fully legitimate. The "warning" on the other hand was not. -The Gnome (talk) 07:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - part of a mass nomination series, this one is probably not notable, based on that I could only find a single source where she a primary focus of a reliable source. I would not oppose a merger or redirect. Bearian (talk) 19:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A few sources about protests in the country, in general, but not much about our subject per se. E.g. here we have a report titled "Protesting Pashtuns demand public hanging of Pervez Musharraf" with one mention of our subject ("one human rights activist, Nargis Afsheen Khattak, tweeted", etc). Nothing substantial and dedicated. Unsupported claims that "sources exist" don't do much. -The Gnome (talk) 08:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.