The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Arreat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This fictional location does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. TTN (talk) 18:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a fictional locale that just isn't notable. RMHED (talk) 19:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Contains game guide information and original research, not to mention lacks reliable sources as the nom stated. MuZemike (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, at the risk of sounding like a broken record, more plot rehash. Nifboy (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Generally there is no need for separate articles n fictional locations, so it should be proposed for a merge. At the least its a reasonable search term, and could be redirected to a list of locations. I cannot tell from the article whether its the major location in the game). DGG (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not notable independent of the Diablo series, then redirect to an appropriate Diablo-related article. Stifle (talk) 14:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.