The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MobileDay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

solely an ad for this company, which could probably qualify for WP:TNT in the first place.

as for notability, i found no sources looking around the web after a while. the three sources currently in the article consist only of one primary source, one source is permanently dead, and the last source, while admittedly being a reliable source, doesn't have any substantial content on it. 晚安 (トークページ) 10:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and Software. 晚安 (トークページ) 10:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, possibly speedily as a A7 or G11. Not close to being notable.--Mvqr (talk) 10:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete pure promotion. Not every instance of "two kids and an app" is notable just for getting some seed funding. W Nowicki (talk) 22:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.