The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Off2riorob (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mircea Irimescu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prsaucer1958 (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• The article is about a non-notanle athlete. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The subject appears to qualify as notable under WP:ATHLETE since he is reported as having played in the top division of Romanian football as well as playing for the Romanian national team. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Clearly passes ATHLETE having played Internationally for Romania, including WC qualifiers--ClubOranje^T 07:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Passes WP:ATHLETE. Joe Chill (talk) 23:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 01:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - clearly passes WP:ATHLETE. A lazy nomination. GiantSnowman 01:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - as a romanian international he's inherently notable. 01:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
• Snowball keep - Obviously notable athlete (and also a notable politician). I spent five minutes and added two references and fleshed out the article a slight bit. Article clearly passes GNG and ATHLETE, although it ought to be expanded and better sourced (no reason to delete at all). Jogurney (talk) 02:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.