The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 00:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle Workers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable TV stub that has barely been improved upon since it was created almost 11 years ago. Cindlevet (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It attracted media attention at the time, both with reviews and stories about individual patients featured. I added a small critical reaction section with some links. There is more if you google (which you are supposed to do before nominating.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural keep nominator does not seem to have done WP:BEFORE due dilligence. Newimpartial (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.